Why Powerful Machine Learning Is Deceptively Easy
Or why what appears powerful can be methodologically fragile The post Why Powerful Machine Learning Is Deceptively Easy appeared first on Towards Data Science.
Browse all AI articles. Use filters to narrow down results.
Or why what appears powerful can be methodologically fragile The post Why Powerful Machine Learning Is Deceptively Easy appeared first on Towards Data Science.
On this day in 2006, Dark Reading went live. We have a celebration planned that spans our two decades of covering the industry, and you, dear readers, are invited.
Katrina Manson / Bloomberg: Sources: the US DOD strikes agreements with Nvidia, Microsoft, Reflection AI, and AWS to use their AI tools on classified military networks for “lawful” use — The Pentagon has struck agreements with four more technology companies for expansive use of advanced artificial intelligence tools …
Discussion | Link
In 2025, the Bay Area expanded its dominance of U.S. seed funding — capturing a growing share of both deals and dollars — even as most startups remained geographically dispersed, an analysis of Crunchbase data shows, resulting in a more bifurcated landscape.
As of 1st June 2026, GitHub Copilot will charge its users on the basis of the tokens they use, rather than a flat rate subscription model. The model that’s seeing the shutters closed on it is, or rather was, simple to understand and use. Users were given a set number of ‘Premium Requests’ according to […] The post Per-token AI charges come to GitHub Copilot appeared first on AI News.
Dina Bass / Bloomberg: Cloud computing provider Nebius agrees to buy Eigen AI, which optimizes the performance of chips running AI inference tasks, for $615M in stock and cash — Cloud computing provider Nebius Group NV agreed to buy Eigen AI, a startup that boosts the performance of chips used …
Discussion | Link
Generative AI represents the most consequential shift in enterprise technology since the Internet...
Amanda Hoover; Alyssa Powell/BI This post originally appeared in the Business Insider Today newsletter. You can sign up for Business Insider's daily newsletter here. BI's Amanda Hoover created an AI bot trained on her body of work to see if it could do her job. The experiment was an eye-opener, but it didn't leave her worried about losing her job to AI. To be clear, this isn't one of those run-of-the-mill "ChatGPT wrote this story" bits that were everywhere in 2023. When Amanda says she had AI do her job, she means it. From conducting interviews with a voice agent to trying to write the story to dealing with an editor, "Amanda Bot" did it all. The exercise highlighted the abilities and limitations of tech destined to upend our work lives. Others can't get enough of using AI agents on the job. Andy Cabasso manages 37 AI agents that handle everything from pulling analytics to scheduling follow-up meetings. He's even given them fictional personalities, modeling his vendor-negotiations agent after an FBI hostage negotiator. Cabasso has a dog in this fight. He manages growth operations at ClickUp, a productivity platform where AI agents are becoming increasingly important. Still, that doesn't discredit his experience. More people are proudly touting the tasks they've outsourced to agents. It's part of a shift from using AI tools for one-off tasks to giving the tech the freedom to figure things out on its own. "With AI, you don't tell the computer what to do step-by-step anymore. Instead, you tell it what you want, you lay out your objective, your plan, and the computer reasons and executes your plan," Aravind Srinivas, cofounder and CEO of Perplexity AI, said at a recent event. How far you're willing to let AI take the wheel likely depends on your seniority. An executive with an endless to-do list is more likely to hand things off to AI than a junior employee who's still trying to prove their worth. The real question: Will the executive wait long enough for the junior to figure things out before assigning a bot to do it instead? Read the original article on Business Insider
The distinction between data science vs data engineering shapes how organizations build, scale...
Michael Acton / Financial Times: Apple CFO Kevan Parekh says “the iPhone 17 family is now the most popular lineup in our history” and “we believe we gained market share during the quarter” — John Ternus pledges to continue ‘deliberateness and discipline’ in first comments since being named next CEO
A Brightline train in Miami. Bloomberg/Getty Images Brightline, Miami's local railway, is raising ticket prices more than sixfold during the World Cup. A round-trip rail ticket usually costs $24, but it will be up to $151 on gamedays. Miami is hosting seven games during the soccer tournament. Tickets for Miami's Brightline railway will be up to six times the usual price for FIFA World Cup fans. A round trip between downtown Miami and Aventura, the Brightline station closest to the Hard Rock Stadium, typically costs $24. On days when it hosts World Cup games, the price ranges from $76 to $151, Business Insider found when visiting Brightline's website. That makes it the most expensive transit system of all 16 cities hosting games during the tournament, which starts June 11. The two stations are about 13 miles apart — or 17 minutes on a Brightline train. Brightline's booking site shows a $151 round-trip for June 24, when Scotland plays Brazil. It also costs $76 for the first game in Miami — Saudi Arabia vs Uruguay — and $141 for the city's other five matches. The same ticket on other days in June and July costs $24. Miami-Dade County is organizing free shuttle buses for ticket holders to the stadium from the Aventura station, about a 20-minute drive, a spokesperson previously told The Athletic. It's also running buses from a commuter rail station, a Metrorail station, and the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel, they added. Brightline did not reply to requests for comment from Business Insider. In addition to four group-stage games, Miami is scheduled to host a round-of-32 game, a quarter-final, and the third-place playoff. Miami joins New Jersey and Boston in hiking prices New Jersey Transit faced criticism earlier this month when it announced $150 tickets for a round-trip journey between Manhattan's Penn Station and MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey. That's more than 11-times as expensive as the $12.90 it usually costs. The two stations are about six miles apart, as the crow flies. And in Boston, soccer fans will pay $80 for a round-trip train ticket or $95 for a coach ticket to travel the 20 miles between downtown and Gillette Stadium. The train ride usually costs $20 for a round trip during NFL gamedays, or $8.75 on a normal day. None of the other 13 host cities has raised transit prices during the World Cup. In Philadelphia, it is set to be $2.90, or half the usual price, because fans get a free metro ride returning from games. In Atlanta and Houston, metro tickets will cost $2.50 for a round-trip. Dallas said it would introduce free shuttle buses between the AT&T Stadium and the nearest train station, while Kansas City is launching a $15 shuttle bus service. This year's World Cup is set to be hugely expensive for fans, in part because FIFA has introduced dynamic pricing for match tickets. Group-stage tickets have ranged from $60, available to the most loyal fans, to over $4,000 for the US's first game, against Paraguay, when FIFA released "last-minute" tickets last week. Four nations are debuting at this year's tournament, too, aided by its expansion from 32 to 48 teams: Cape Verde, Curaçao, Jordan, and Uzbekistan. Brazil, Cape Verde, Colombia, Portugal, Saudi Arabia, Scotland, and Uruguay are scheduled to play in Miami during the group stage. Read the original article on Business Insider
This guide gives data leaders, engineers, and practitioners a practical map of AI...
Twilio CEO Khozema Shipchandler. Business Wire/AP Twilio's stock soared 19% after strong earnings, reflecting its successes in integrating AI. CEO Khozema Shipchandler leads Twilio's strategic shift, focusing on AI and key product returns. Activist investors pushed for cost cuts; Twilio's AI and data bets drive renewed growth. When Khozema Shipchandler took the helm as CEO of the cloud communications company Twilio in early 2024, activist investors were demanding cost cuts. Its stock had declined sharply since its pandemic high in 2021. The company has worked to turn itself around, and its bets on AI may be paying off. Twilio stock soared by more than 19% in out-of-hours trading — hitting its highest level in four years — after a strong earnings report on Thursday. Twilio builds tools that help companies make calls or send texts from apps. For example, if you've ever made a call from the Uber or Lyft app to get in touch with your driver, that's powered by Twilio. Twilio was one of the big beneficiaries during the pandemic cloud boom as its stock more than quadrupled between 2020 and 2021, peaking in early 2021. Its stock has never fully recovered to that high, after slumps in 2023 and 2024 when Twilio was viewed as an acquisition target. Now it's picking back up. On Thursday, Twilio reported that its revenue grew 20% year over year — its fastest growth rate in three years. Along with several changes to how Twilio operates, Shipchandler says its bet on integrating AI and data into its product has helped it grow. "Every single one of these companies needs some way to communicate with these customers. They need context to power their interactions," Shipchandler told Business Insider. Last year, Twilio also had its first full year of GAAP profitability, with nearly $1 billion in free cash flow. Twilio's AI strategy Prior to replacing cofounder Jeff Lawson as CEO, Shipchandler served as the company's CFO, and activists were demanding that Twilio make changes and cut costs as its growth stalled and it burned through cash. "I wouldn't say that we caved into the demands," Shipchandler said. "We certainly listened to the investors, to the extent that there are a number of things worth considering. We had already considered how we would get smarter about the cost profile." In particular, activist investors wanted Twilio to sell Segment, a customer data business it had acquired for $3.2 billion, which was unprofitable. Shipchandler calls this a "short-sighted call." Ultimately, Twilio decided to keep Segment, and he says it became one of the most "consequential decisions we made." Segment has helped Twilio with integrating data into AI models to improve customer engagement. Customers can then use Twilio's communication and data capabilities to build their apps. Twilio also sees a major opportunity in AI agents. IDC has projected that Twilio could be the underlying infrastructure for 80-100 million agents by 2029. Twilio itself uses AI tools such as Gemini and Claude Code internally, and Shipchandler said employees have achieved a 15% productivity boost with AI. It uses AI to help with coding, as well as for customer support and inbound sales. The company has made other changes to its operations besides betting on AI. Shipchandler said that the company is focusing on a few of its top products to get a higher return on investment for customers, rather than spreading itself "too thin." It also shook up its new leadership team, with new product, marketing, and revenue chiefs. Twilio saw an exodus of executives in 2023, along with layoffs, Business Insider previously reported. "Adding in that new blood has created new ideas," Shipchandler said. Twilio isn't worried about the SaaSpocalypse Twilio, like many software-as-a-service (SaaS) companies, has seen its stock hit hard as investors fear the impact of AI on their businesses. Shipchandler said Twilio sees AI as a catalyst because it's more of an infrastructure company. What's more, he said that people can't vibe code much of what Twilio does because it meets regulatory requirements for telecommunications companies. "While you see all these different pressures in the SaaS world, we see ourselves positioned nicely as the infrastructure that drives a lot of the activity you're seeing," Shipchandler said. Have a tip? Contact this reporter via email at rmchan@businessinsider.com, or Signal at rosal.13. Use a personal email address, a nonwork WiFi network, and a nonwork device; here's our guide to sharing information securely. Read the original article on Business Insider
Meryl Streep as Miranda Priestly in "The Devil Wears Prada 2." Macall Polay/20th Century Studios "The Devil Wears Prada 2" explores changes in workplace culture since the original 2006 film. Meryl Streep's Miranda Priestly is vicious and undeniably glamorous, but those qualities now make her seem out of touch. Warning: Spoilers ahead for "The Devil Wears Prada 2." For the last two decades, the name Miranda Priestly has brought to mind a set of iconic images: a frosty white bob, a withering stare to rival Medusa's, and, of course, a pile of designer coats and purses brusquely dumped atop her assistant's desk. Back in 2006, "The Devil Wears Prada" used those images to introduce Meryl Streep's Miranda as a paragon of couture, competence, and a kind of hierarchical viciousness that would feel more appropriate in a medieval throne room than a boardroom. But in the long-awaited sequel, out Friday, one of Miranda's fiercest weapons has been dulled: her tyranny. "The Devil Wears Prada 2" largely plays this change for humor. Miranda's former assistant, Andy Sachs (Anne Hathaway) who's returned to the fictional Runway magazine as a serious journalist, learns that an HR complaint is the reason Miranda must now wrestle her own coats into the office closet — a quotidian task that Streep completes with a flair for physical comedy. Miranda's struggles to adjust to the culture shift in the workplace make for some of the film's funniest moments, like when a Freudian slip leads her to describe size diversity on the runway as "body-negative," to her assistant's chagrin. It's a marked change from the Miranda who presided over Runway 20 years ago. Though the original film contains glimpses of the pressure Miranda faced as a woman in charge — especially in the memorably tender scene after her husband asks for a divorce — for the most part, her demanding and aloof nature translated onscreen in 2006 as the inevitable price of being glamorous and chic. Miranda Priestly wasn't one of the people by design. In the words of her right-hand man, Nigel (Stanley Tucci), "Her opinion is the only one that matters." A lot has changed in the ensuing decades. Although Miranda is still aloof and intimidating in 2026, those qualities no longer signal power in the workplace — in fact, they often read as out of touch. Miranda's preferred form of leadership has fallen out of fashion Anne Hathaway as Andy Sachs, Meryl Streep as Miranda Priestly, and Stanley Tucci as Nigel Kipling in "The Devil Wears Prada 2." Macall Polay/20th Century Studios This shift is most apparent in "The Devil Wears Prada 2" when Miranda is surrounded by people perched above her on the food chain. (Yes, even Miranda answers to someone. She's the editor in chief of a Vogue-like fashion magazine, not its owner.) When Miranda's longtime boss, Irv Ravitz (Tibor Feldman), suddenly dies, his son, Jay Ravitz (B.J. Novak), assumes control of Runway. Swathed in greyscale athleisure — a fireable offense in the magazine's heyday — and carrying an air of postmodern flippancy, Jay represents how casualized office culture has become, both in the literal sense of Silicon Valley aesthetics and in the emotional sense of slumping morale. Miranda's standing as an A-list executive who's steered Runway for decades and maintained its reputation as an arbiter of taste doesn't matter to Jay. He treats her like any other employee: He leaves her hanging for weeks after a major company crisis, then shows up to her office unannounced with a small army of cost-cutting consultants. He gives her playful, condescending punches on the shoulder and makes her eat in the office cafeteria in something close to a humiliation ritual. (Nigel remarks in shock, "She's never even been to that floor.") Anyone who's had a boss like Miranda may enjoy watching her be taken down a few pegs, which is likely the point. The movie accurately depicts how changing views on workplace harassment have upended management in the time since "The Devil Wears Prada" premiered in 2006. That's not to say Jay's management style is much healthier. He still wields power with relish and cold disregard for other people's livelihoods — it's just that his disrespect and megalomania are expressed with performative casualness. The three martini lunches and cutthroat red carpet events have been replaced with cafeteria food and a hollow insistence that "we're all a family." Jay, along with the wealthy tech bro Benji Barnes (Justin Theroux), are positioned as the real villains of "The Devil Wears Prada 2," much more so than Miranda, who, by the story's end, clings to her position at Runway by the tips of her French manicure. It's clear that her reign of terror, if not her reign at Runway in any capacity, is nearing its end. In one of the film's final scenes, Miranda shocks Andy with a moment of self-reflection. Sitting in the back of a car with a twinkle in her eye, she encourages Andy to write the tell-all memoir about working under her that she'd secretly been plotting. If she does, Miranda implores, she must include all the juicy and unflattering bits: Miranda's impatience, her flashes of spite, her perennial allergy to compromise. Miranda understands the importance of mythology. Perhaps a bestselling exposé, she muses, can help her cling to relevance a little longer. More likely, however, Andy's book will read like a eulogy for the kind of boss that once stalked the halls of corporate America. Rest in peace, Miranda Priestly: They don't make tyrants like you anymore. Read the original article on Business Insider
Smack dab between Australia and South America, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) research vessel Rainier is currently on a mission to map more than 8,000 square nautical miles of the Pacific seafloor in search of critical mineral deposits. But it isn’t doing it alone; for a month starting this week, it will…
Courtesy of Kayla Barnes-Lentz Kayla Barnes-Lentz is trying to delay menopause to age 60 to extend health and fertility. She follows a strict routine and tests experimental treatments for ovarian health, including rapamycin. Proven methods for protecting reproductive health include taking antioxidants and leading a healthy lifestyle. This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Kayla Barnes-Lentz, the 35-year-old host of the "Longevity Optimization Podcast," based in Austin. It has been edited for length and clarity. The average age at which women go into menopause in the US is 52. My goal is to delay going into menopause until I'm 60. I'm trying to live in good health for as long as possible. And as a woman, one part of this is ovarian health. Some researchers suspect that slowing ovarian aging and delaying menopause could be a game changer for female longevity, so I am trying to optimize my general and ovarian health to delay menopause as long as I can. This would also extend the number of fertile years I have, which is important to me because I'm 35 and my husband and I haven't started having children yet — and we would like to have a relatively large family. There's so much pressure on women to build a career, get married, and have a family, all within a short period of time. I want to try to prolong that window for myself and for other women in the future. I follow a strict health optimization protocol My health optimization protocol is all about mastering the basics. I go to bed at 8:30 p.m. and get sunlight at 7:30 a.m. every day to keep my circadian rhythm regular. I try to reduce stress wherever I can, exercise regularly, have eliminated ultra-processed foods from my diet, and follow the Mediterranean diet. I also optimize my environment to keep the levels of toxic forever chemicals in my body as low as possible, which I test via total toxic burden tests four times a year. This means always using glass containers instead of plastic, drinking filtered water instead of tap water, wearing natural fiber clothing instead of synthetic, and doing a lot of sauna to sweat out toxins. But despite all my health interventions, I had no way of knowing if what I was doing was actually improving my ovarian health until recently. I did a MenoTime test, developed by Timeless Biotech, which measures many different health markers — such as hormone levels, waist-to-hip ratio, sleep quality, and advanced bloodwork — to estimate the relative age of my ovaries. The results said that my ovarian age is 30, five years younger than my chronological age, and estimates that I'm going to go into menopause at 55. But I'm trying to increase that to 60 by testing experimental health protocols specifically to improve my ovarian health. I am now focusing on experimental treatments to delay ovarian aging To delay menopause, I have been focusing on three hallmarks of ovarian aging: the loss of eggs, mitochondrial dysfunction, and thickening of ovarian tissue. To try to stop the loss of my eggs, I have been taking rapamycin, what they are studying in the VIBRANT study to see if it delays ovarian aging. It hasn't been completed or peer reviewed yet, but researchers believe rapamycin could reduce the number of eggs women lose each month. I'll be cycling through two months of taking rapamycin and then taking time off. We have mitochondria in most of our cells, so all of my basic health protocols help with avoiding dysfunction there, especially high-intensity interval training — but we have the highest density of mitochondria in our ovaries than anywhere else in our bodies. So I'm also specifically going to do red light therapy for my ovarian mitochondrial health, which has been tested in some animal studies. I have also been doing hyperbaric oxygen therapy — an hour a day, five times a week, for 40 sessions, twice a year — to improve blood flow to potentially slow down the thickening of ovarian tissue, which makes them less efficient. Air quality has been linked to reduced ovarian reserve, so I measure it in every room of my house. I even moved from Los Angeles to Texas to avoid breathing in toxins after the recent wildfires. I'll do what I can until I go into menopause I'm also going to test a mitochondrial cocktail of supplements that studies suggest could support mitochondrial health, including urolithin A and MitoQ (mitoquinone mesylate). In the future, I would love to do stem cell treatments directed at the ovaries, and I'm always on the lookout for any other interventions I can try, too. Generally, we know that improving the health of your whole body will also improve the health of your ovaries. But it's very sad and very crazy to me that it's 2026 and we still don't have answers about why the ovaries age at almost twice the rate of every other organ. So, I'm excited to do this to help provide women with answers about their hormonal health, longevity, and aging one day. I want to try to get pregnant later this year, so I will be doing this protocol until then. I'd also like to do more interventions post-baby, because we have essentially no data on any of this on pregnant or post-partum women. But ideally, I want to be doing all of this until I enter menopause — hopefully as late as possible. Read the original article on Business Insider
Lovable "felt very accessible as somebody who's non-technical," Mindaugas Petrutis said. Illustration by Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images Mindaugas Petrutis was initially rejected for a Lovable job, but later became one of its first 50 employees. He decided he wanted to work at Lovable and said he tried to get noticed in various ways. Petrutis said applicants should think outside the box and shouldn't rely on submitting applications. This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Mindaugas Petrutis, a 43-year-old content creator and consultant based in Dublin. His former employment and identity have been confirmed by Business Insider. The following has been edited for length and clarity. I'm a free agent. I do content creation, build products with AI for people in fashion and music, and do some consulting for startups on influencer marketing. I discovered Lovable around August 2024, when they were still in the very early stages. I was completely non-technical and couldn't write a line of code, but I started playing around with different tools, and Lovable really stuck with me. It felt very accessible as somebody who's non-technical. I built a daily practice: Every day, I would build something in 30 minutes. Even if I had no ideas, I would ask ChatGPT to generate five random ideas, pick the most interesting one, and try to build it. The goal was to understand the tool's capabilities and limitations, and to learn something new. Eventually, I used ChatGPT to help me come up with a self-service two-week job-search sprint platform, where I distilled my process about how to look for jobs and coached people. There were seven steps that progressively unlocked every two days. I recorded a lot of voice notes, collected all my writing on how I approach job searching, and distilled it into this product. I decided I wanted to join Lovable Mindaugas Petrutis said he tries to find ways into companies without applying. Mindaugas Petrutis I got a bunch of customers, and kept building with Lovable and talking about it. I was so obsessed with Lovable that I applied for a role at the company. A few days later, I got a rejection email. A couple of months later, the team reached out and was like, "Hey, would you be interested in having a chat?" So I jumped on a call, and they asked me to come in and help solve the problem they had, which was influencer marketing. That was the job description. We did an hour brainstorming session a few days later. Then I met one of the founders, and they made me an offer. That's how I've ended up in interesting places, companies, or projects for the last 10 to 15 years. I had decided that I wanted to join Lovable, and a lot of the things that I did were to get noticed by them. Instead of building with Lovable in isolation, I started posting about it. I knew their head of design from an online community I had built a few years ago, and I started emailing him everything I built. A lot of those emails went into the void. He's a busy person. But he responded to some of them, and he did see them, and I stayed top of mind. He was the one who mentioned me internally when they had hired the head of growth, and when that person came in, they said, "Hey, I'm going to be hiring for these types of people. Who do you know?" I refuse to accept a rejection A lot of people apply for a role, either don't hear anything back or get rejected, and then think, "That's it." I literally refuse. I often don't even apply for roles because I was a recruiter many years ago, and I know how imperfect those systems are. Often, someone who is perfect for the job may never end up on the hiring manager's desk because of how those systems are set up. My advice is always to not take "no" for an answer and find another way in. The best founders raise money from VCs using the same approach. You have to be personalized. You have to provide something of value. It's so easy right now because everybody has something online. Instead of messaging a hiring manager to say, "I see you're hiring for this job," which they get hundreds of, find a way to stand out. Find something interesting about them, like a blog post they published. A lot of people DM me asking for my time, but the only ones I answer are those who say something like, "Hey, I was at an event that you spoke at, and I really liked what you said about this. Here's my counterpoint." Once I see that they've referenced something specific in the first couple of lines, I'm sold, because you spent 20 or 30 minutes doing the research, and now I'm more willing to give you my time. Read the original article on Business Insider
Peter Diamandis is a futurist, author, and podcast host. Bloomberg/Getty Images Peter Diamandis shared the three things he believes children need to succeed in the AI age. The futurist said kids need to find their purpose, be curious, and cultivate the right mindset. Diamandis fell in love with space at an early age, inspired by the Moon landing and "Star Trek." Children need three things to thrive in the AI era, says famed futurist Peter Diamandis. The serial entrepreneur and author of the newly published "We Are As Gods: A Survival Guide for the Age of Abundance" told Business Insider the skills and traits he's trying to instill in his twin teenage sons. The founder of the XPRIZE Foundation and host of the "Moonshots with Peter Diamandis" podcast urged parents to help their children find their "massive transformative purpose" in life. Diamandis said he felt "lucky" to have pinpointed space as his purpose at a young age, and was "thankful" to the Apollo 11 Moon landing and original "Star Trek" series for "igniting that fuse." Finding his purpose meant he felt motivated to "learn for myself, not for my parents, not for my teachers," he said. If you're a child today, Diamandis said, you can use AI to explore whatever you like. But you'll either do "surface learning" for school, or you're "going to go deep" because you "love it in your heart and soul." Diamandis said the second "critically important" trait for the next generation is curiosity, as curious children will want to "learn the tools," and take advantage of AI providing boundless learning about any subject with the "most patient teacher." Third, Diamandis said the "greatest thing" for kids to focus on in the years ahead is their "mindset" and how to shape it. He listed prominent figures, including his longtime friend Elon Musk, Apple cofounder Steve Jobs, social activist Mahatma Gandhi, and civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr. What made those individuals successful, Diamandis said, wasn't "their money, their technology, their friends" but their mindset. "If you took away everything from them and kept their mindset, they would be as successful," he added. Diamandis said he teaches not only a curious, purpose-driven mindset but also "an abundance mindset, an exponential mindset, a moonshot mindset, and a longevity mindset." There's widespread concern about how future generations of workers will fare as advances in AI and robotics threaten to eliminate large numbers of jobs. Diamandis is one of several successful people to share their advice for young people with Business Insider. Billionaire investor Leon Cooperman said, "Love what you do — it's too demanding and difficult not to." Wall Street legend Burton Malkiel said to "be flexible and realize that you could very well change your mind." Tech investor Ross Gerber said that kids need to pay attention in class, build social networks at school, and learn from their parents and peers, as many are growing up with no skills "other than playing Roblox," and expect work to be a "four-hour-a-day job" they can do from home. Read the original article on Business Insider