Articles

Browse all AI articles. Use filters to narrow down results.

Showing 20921 to 20940 of 30961 entries.

Most Recent Articles

Business Insider
newsbusiness insider

Taylor Mitchell turned a frugal shopping habit into a 7-figure income. Jonathan Zuluaga Taylor Mitchell turned her frugal Walmart shopping habit into a seven-figure income. The 29-year-old mom of three recommends products at Walmart and other retailers through a virtual storefront. She discussed overcoming struggles, balancing social media's demands, and switching marital roles. This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Taylor Mitchell of Greenville, SC, who turned her financial life around by driving affiliate sales for Walmart and other retailers. The following has been edited for length and clarity. I was a young mom when I started a link-in-bio online storefront selling products for Walmart and other retailers. I'd been a paralegal and stopped working after my daughter was born. We made it work, but my husband had to sell his truck. For so long, we could barely keep $1,000 in our savings account. I was already buying Walmart clothes constantly because it was all I could afford. I started to fall in love with the things they had, and I wanted to share that information with others. We all want to look really cute, but we all need to stick to a budget. So any time I needed to go to Walmart, I started to take pictures and share things, and it just started doing well. I don't limit myself to Walmart, but that's what works best for me income-wise and what I enjoy the most. I started earning money in 2020. It was very minimal income for several years, but it was enough to help with diapers and groceries. Then things exploded in 2025 when I started pushing affiliate marketing through the Later platform. It's been beyond my wildest dreams. We were always living paycheck to paycheck. Now I'm doing around $100,000 a month, give or take. My husband and I are always pinching ourselves. Developing a signature style I love wearing bright colors and fun statement pieces. My style came out of my postpartum journey. I'd been posting on social media for eight years, sharing pictures and outfits. I went through a big weight loss — I used to be over 250 pounds — and shared that online as well. After my third child three years ago, I went on this health journey and took everybody along with me. I wanted to feel good, be healthy, and be able to shop for clothes and feel confident in them. I'd been in the mom culture world for so many years, I think I have a really good eye for what would sell well. I posted about a hot-pink glider lawn chair I saw in Walmart the other day that was super cute, but for moms, it's a justifiable purchase. Places like Walmart or Target are very justifiable for people to order from because they probably already have other things in their cart. Switching roles at home As my business grew, my husband left his job as a manager in the distribution center at Walmart to be my assistant and full-time dad. It got to the point where we thought his job was losing us money because there was so much he could be helping me with if he were home. Things really felt real when he left because we had been using his income as a security blanket. I was so scared I'd wake up one morning, and it would all go away. Becoming the main breadwinner wasn't uncomfortable for us because my husband and I have always been on the same page with money. We always had a joint account, and we were always just paying our bills and figuring out what we needed. I'd worried about not being able to provide things like karate, dance, and sports for my children. The biggest thing that happened for us once we started seeing this money come in was that our stress melted away. His mental health has also improved, being able to be with our family so much. I feel like there are so many men out there who would excel in that role that's traditionally more for women, but they don't have the same opportunity to. Dealing with social media's pitfalls Not everyone is nice online — I realized that when I started sharing my health journey. There's the pressure of keeping up. And sometimes things will fail, and it has nothing to do with anything I did: It's the algorithm. That stuff that is so frustrating when you've worked really hard on something. And with social media, when you don't post as many times, you almost get put out of the algorithm. So it's hard for me at times to slow down because I want to make sure that I'm not hurting my ability to reach people. I definitely have to keep reminding myself I need to chill out. Long term, our hope is to do different things like invest and potentially take on rental properties, so we don't have to rely solely on me posting. But right now, I'm loving every second of posting. Read the original article on Business Insider

Towards Data Science
agentic aiartificial intelligenceclaude skillsdata sciencellmprompt engineeringaitowards data scienceclaude

Without these, Claude will be confidently wrong. The post 4 Lines You Should Include in Your Claude Skill appeared first on Towards Data Science.

OpenAI Blog
productaiopenai blogopenai

OpenAI launches the Partner Network, investing $150M to help global partners accelerate enterprise AI adoption, deployment, and transformation.

Business Insider
newsbusiness insider

Emily Blunt stars in Steven Spielberg's new sci-fi thriller, "Disclosure Day." Gareth Cattermole/Gareth Cattermole/Getty Images Emily Blunt refused to use AI in Steven Spielberg's new film, "Disclosure Day." Blunt created the alien language used in the film by experimenting in her bathroom. Some actors have pushed back against AI in the entertainment industry. Emily Blunt took a very human approach to creating the alien language in Steven Spielberg's new film "Disclosure Day." During her press tour for the film, Blunt said she refused Spielberg's offer to use AI to perfect the clicking noises her character makes in the film. "He said, 'You know, we could do it with AI, or you could do it,'" Blunt told Entertainment Tonight earlier this month. "And I was like, 'I feel confident I can make some weird noises.'" Blunt said she experimented with sounds alone in her bathroom and would send different versions to Spielberg. "Clicking, humming, doing weird Barry White sort of low singing mixed with clicking with Morse code sounds," Blunt said. "I just tried everything. We sort of threw the kitchen sink at it, and I think he wanted it to sound mathematical and not too terrifying." She said the final version audiences hear in "Disclosure Day" is an accumulation of layered noises she recorded in a sound booth. Spielberg's extraterrestrial thriller, which debuted on Friday, also stars Josh O'Connor, Colin Firth, Colman Domingo, and Eve Hewson. Although parts of Hollywood have embraced AI as a way to speed up production and save money, others have derided and protested the technology. Critics are concerned AI could displace human workers, use their likeness or voice without consent, and devalue art. Blunt has, so far, been unimpressed by AI. She was dismayed during a Variety interview in September 2025 when she learned about AI actor Tilly Norwood. "That is really, really scary. Come on, agencies, don't do that. Please stop. Please stop taking away our human connection," Blunt told Variety. In April, Blunt also said AI is a "very scary bubble to poke your head inside" while speaking to USA Today. "My children don't go online, and they're young still. You're kind of holding on to them by their ankles as they get older and want more independence," Blunt said. "At some point, I'm sure they'll want a phone — they'd probably like one now, and they're not going to get one. It's like having a drug dealer in your house that doesn't pay rent or actually give you any of the good stuff." Blunt isn't the only actor to criticize AI, and some have even taken legal action to protect their brand. Matthew McConaughey, for example, has secured several trademarks meant to protect his likeness and certain iconic phrases. Singers Taylor Swift and Lionel Richie have also filed trademark applications for their likenesses. Read the original article on Business Insider

Techmeme
techtechmeme

The Guardian: Sources: UK plans an “Australia plus” social media ban for under-16s, including restrictions on chatting with strangers on gaming apps, under-18 curfews, more  —  Sources say hardline measures will also prevent young users from being able to talk to strangers on gaming apps

Business Insider
newsbusiness insider

A Knicks fan celebrates the team's first championship in 53 years in New York City. David Dee Delgado/Getty Images The Knicks won their first championship in 53 years on Saturday. The electric playoff run inspired the entire city — even non-sports fans like me. Here are some takeaways from a non-sports fan watching history unfold. One of the things that makes sports so special is the room it has for people like me — outsiders who don't follow every number and player but who love a close contest in the end. Especially one in her own hometown. So here are some thoughts, not from a sports writer but from a not-sports writer, on the history that just happened. Human achievement is still far and away the greatest joy. Human achievement as a team is a special joy. Human achievement as an individual is a special joy. The ability to mess up and keep delivering at your best is hard — but essential. In the face of inevitably great competition, resilience and determination are essential. Dusting off life's bum calls against you is essential. Youth is great, but so is experience. Hard work and preparation set you free. People want to unite in celebration. People want to embrace their commonalities. Social media can still be fun and amplify wonder. Partaking in something bigger helps make life worth living. Read the original article on Business Insider

Business Insider
newsbusiness insider

We spent 48 hours seeing Niagara Falls in New York and Canada, doing both touristy activities in the city and underrated ones nearby. Ash Jurberg My cousin and I spent 48 hours visiting Niagara Falls. We spent time in both New York and Canada. I'm glad we saw Niagara Falls from the air, from the water, and from the base. Attractions like Maid of the Mist were fun, but the best parts of the trip were outside of the city. My cousin Belik lives in the US, is 15 years younger than me, loves to camp, and had already been to Niagara Falls twice. I'm an Aussie, prefer hotels, and had never made it to the Falls. When our schedules aligned for 48 hours together, we had very different ideas about how to use them. He wanted to go on long hikes and camp on Lake Ontario. I wanted to hit the major tourist attractions, including boat and helicopter tours of the Falls. Ultimately, we agreed to do a mix of both. By the end of our outing, we'd had some incredible experiences and discovered some of the best ways to plan a great trip to the area. A 10-minute helicopter tour was a worthy splurge My wife was more worried about me being in the helicopter than I was. Ash Jurberg I'd always wanted to take a helicopter ride, and Niagara Falls seemed the perfect place to try it. We booked a 10-minute tour through Rainbow Air and paid $180 each for tickets on the day of. My cousin and I ended up having the helicopter to ourselves (likely because of the poor weather). Belik had been hesitant about this pricey tour before we took off, but his skepticism faded once we were in the air. Ten minutes doesn't sound like much, but from up high, we got to appreciate the scale of the Falls. The Maid of the Mist boats below looked like ants. The tour cost more than I'd usually spend, but it was the first thing I told people about when I got home. If you've only got the budget for one splurge here, make it this. The Maid of the Mist boat ride left me wetter than I expected The Maid of the Mist is cool, but not quite what the name suggests, in my opinion. Ash Jurberg The Maid of the Mist tour costs about $30 per person, and boats leave fairly regularly. We bought our tickets the day of. Everyone in the tour receives a hooded poncho, so I knew we would get wet. I did not understand how wet until the boat turned toward the Falls; that's when "mist" suddenly felt like an understatement. I felt the full force of water hitting me from the front, and it was (literally) breathtaking. Despite wearing my poncho, I came off the boat soaked through but so glad I'd done this tour. It was also cool to get close to the falls at Cave of the Winds Cave of the Winds got us to the base of Bridal Veil Falls. Ash Jurberg Just in case I wasn't wet enough, I went straight from Maid of the Mist to the Cave of the Winds, a separate attraction with tickets sold at the entrance. Each of ours cost about $23 and came with another poncho. We were able to walk boardwalks even closer to the water at the base of Bridal Veil Falls. The views were amazing, we got even wetter, and my shoes didn't recover for the rest of the weekend. Ultimately, I think it was worth seeing the Falls three different ways: from the air, from the water, and from the base. Crossing the Rainbow Bridge was cheap and pretty cool Belik thought walking into Canada in the rain would make a good story. Ash Jurberg While we waited for the weather to clear before our aforementioned helicopter ride, Belik suggested we walk across the border from New York to Canada. As an Aussie, this appealed to me. We don't share a land border with anyone. It was pouring, so with ponchos on, we crossed on the Rainbow Bridge, which links Niagara Falls, New York, with Niagara Falls, Ontario. Crossing was free on foot going to Canada, and cost us $1 each coming back. The walk took about 15 minutes and gave us a panoramic view of the Falls and a chance to eat poutine (we were in Canada, after all). The city of Niagara Falls is worth staying in for convenience — but don't skip Lewiston We found a lot to do just outside of Niagara Falls. Ash Jurberg We spent our first night in Niagara Falls to be close to the city's biggest attractions, which was convenient. Unsurprisingly, the city felt pretty crowded and further geared toward tourists with lots of chain restaurants and souvenir shops that didn't appeal to us very much. After a day here, we felt we'd seen enough. Fortunately, there was so much to do outside the city. One of our favorite spots was Lewiston, New York, a town just 15 minutes away. There, we enjoyed eating a fish fry riverside and watching the sunset at the Griffon Gastropub. After dinner, we had drinks at a bar in town. Kayaking the Niagara River was a unique experience. Ash Jurberg We liked the area enough to return the next day to kayak the Niagara River from Lewiston. Our guide told us this stretch was once a crucial part of the Underground Railroad, where freedom seekers crossed into Canada. Hearing that history waterside made the experience feel even more meaningful. We also enjoyed hiking and camping in the area We spent a night at Golden Hill State Park. Ash Jurberg For us, another trip highlight was our early morning hike along the Whirlpool Gorge in Whirlpool State Park just north of Niagara Falls. We had the trail almost to ourselves. Belik got his camping fix, too. We spent our second night in a yurt at Golden Hill State Park, about an hour's drive from the Falls, on Lake Ontario. It was a peaceful way to end the weekend, even if we weren't sleeping in a five-star hotel. At least I was finally dry. Ultimately, I think visitors are making a mistake if they just stop at the Falls The Falls lived up to the hype, but the biggest surprise was what sat a short drive away. Ash Jurberg Travelers who visit Niagara Falls and only stick to major tourist attractions in the city are totally missing out. In the end, I believe the key to our successful 48 hours here was treating the Falls as a starting point, not the star of our trip. Let me be clear: The Falls deliver. Book the helicopter, do the boats, walk to Canada — just don't stop there. It's easy to forget to explore the surrounding region, but it's just as worth your time. Read the original article on Business Insider

TechCrunch
transportationapplespacexgeneral motorslucid motorswaymotechcrunch mobilitytechtechcrunch

Welcome back to TechCrunch Mobility, your hub for the future of transportation and now, more than ever, how AI is playing a part.

Techmeme
techtechmemeanthropic

Reuters: EU says it is looking at the practical consequences of US restricting Anthropic's models, notes such measures “should not be discriminatory against partners”  —  The European Commission said on Sunday that it is assessing the practical implications of a U.S. export control directive …

Techmeme
techtechmemeopenai

Mark Gurman / Bloomberg: Siri AI is good enough to ease Apple's AI crisis; sources: the ability to tap third party AI models beyond OpenAI's is already active in internal iOS 27 builds  —  The company prepares for the foldable iPhone and touch-screen MacBook.  —  Apple's new Siri AI, despite mainly delivering …

Techmeme
techtechmeme

Andrew Osborn / Reuters: Since Russia ratcheted up control over the internet this year, some Russians are turning to solutions like using multiple phones and VPNs to evade restrictions  —  In a quiet cafe popular for its free Wi-Fi and good coffee, a Russian interior designer logs onto a virtual private network …

Towards Data Science
llm applicationsdocument processingllmparsingragvision language modelaitowards data sciencevision

Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol.1 #5quater] - The other parsers read the words on a page. A vision model also reads the pictures The post Vision LLMs are PDF Parsers Too: Reading Charts and Diagrams for RAG appeared first on Towards Data Science.

David Stutz Blog
bloggenerative aihealthresearchdavid stutz bloggeminigooglellmagentagentsbenchmarkvisionmultimodalcomputer visionsafety

I spent the past few years working on AI for health. Starting with custom multimodal encoders, post-training, and sophisticated multi-agent architecturs, I now see modeling work becoming less and less important for domain-specific applications. I believe that researchers should embrace this change and focus on owning the application, workflows, and evals instead. The post Domain-Specific AI Should Focus on Workflows Rather Than Modeling appeared first on David Stutz.

Product Hunt
startupproduct hunt

Fonda

By Harshit

Discussion | Link

Business Insider
newsbusiness insiderragpolicy

Richard Nixon conducted a secret bombing of Cambodia without Congressional approval in 1970. Bettmann Archive/GettyImages Both houses of Congress have advanced War Powers resolutions in the wake of the war with Iran. Presidents have repeatedly ordered military operations without Congress since WWII. In some instances, lawmakers have checked the president's power in response. A week ago, the United States' and Israel's war against Iran passed the 100-day mark. In the more than three months since the war began, a host of ethical, economic, and political questions have arisen about the conflict. One of the most pressing political questions has centered on the legality of the war itself. Operation Epic Fury, a large-scale military operation, was launched without congressional authorization, which lawmakers argue is required under the Constitution. On June 3, the House of Representatives passed a War Powers resolution that, if passed by the Senate, would require the removal of all offensive forces within 30 days of its passage, per PBS News. In May, the Senate advanced its own resolution, which hasn't been brought to a final vote. The House resolution will require 60 votes in the Senate in order to be brought to a vote. President Donald Trump would then hold the ability to veto the resolution, which would require a two-thirds vote from both houses to override it. In May, Trump argued that a ceasefire with Iran meant hostilities were "terminated" and therefore congressional approval wasn't necessary. Since Trump's comments, the US has carried out further strikes against Iran, which government officials labeled "self-defense" strikes, PBS News reported. Congress hasn't officially declared war since June 4, 1942, when it declared war on Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania during World War II. Since then, in instances like the Gulf War, the war in Afghanistan, and the Iraq War, Congress has typically approved force via "Authorization for Use of Military Force." While not an official declaration of war, it allows the military to engage in targeted objectives, according to the Library of Congress. Still, there have been plenty of times throughout American history when the president has ordered large-scale military operations without direct congressional approval, whether through loose interpretations of presidential powers or without providing any legal justification. While this practice has been met with legal challenges at times, in other instances, presidents have avoided scrutiny from Congress due to widespread support for the military action. Andrew Wiest, a professor of military history at the University of Southern Mississippi, said these instances are part of a broader concession of Congressional war powers to the executive branch since WWII. "Since 1946, Congress has relinquished this constitutional authority and granted it to the president, probably much to the founders' chagrin," Wiest said. "The founders were extremely wary of a president with too much military authority." Here are 11 notable examples of US military operations conducted without direct congressional approval. Philippine-American War American soldiers in the Philippines during the Philippine-American War, May 1899. Hulton Archive/Getty Images Even before WWII, certain US military actions were the source of fierce debate. Following the Spanish-American War, the Philippine Islands were ceded to the US in the Treaty of Paris in 1898. Despite the United States' claim to the territory, Filipino revolutionary fighters declared independence and resisted American attempts to acquire the islands. President William McKinley never sought a formal declaration of war or authorization from Congress. Since the Treaty of Paris was newly ratified by Congress, however, McKinley interpreted it as an effective approval of force from lawmakers. The war was controversial in Congress, with anti-imperialists claiming the annexation of the Philippines was illegal, according to the House of Representatives. The war lasted over three years, from 1899 to 1902, and American deaths totaled 4,200. About 20,000 Filipino fighters were killed, while up to 200,000 civilians died of disease, famine, and violence, per the Department of State. Korean War American soldiers in the Korean War. President Truman labeled the effort a "police action." Keystone/Getty Images After the US and Soviet Union divided Korea into two countries following WWII, fighting ensued in 1950 when North Korean forces invaded South Korea. The United Nations Security Council soon directed its member nations to assist South Korea, prompting US involvement. President Harry Truman, however, never sought any form of approval from Congress, instead labeling the US's efforts a "police action" under the auspices of the UN. This framing was refuted by some members of Congress, with Republican Senator Robert Taft claiming the lack of congressional approval was "a complete usurpation by the president of authority to use the armed forces of this country," per the Brennan Center. The war's identity as an international effort overshadowed the lack of congressional approval, according to Wiest. "At the time, the UN was young, robust, and something new," Wiest said. "With a UN resolution to defend South Korea, what more top cover do you need?" The Korean War ultimately lasted three years and resulted in the deaths of 37,000 American soldiers, according to the Department of Defense. As many as 5 million people lost their lives in total from the conflict, many of them civilians. Vietnam War American soldiers of the 173th airborne are evacuated by helicopter from a Vietcong position in December 1965. AFP via Getty Images Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in August 1964, giving President Lyndon Johnson the authority to use military force in Vietnam and the surrounding countries. But as the war dragged on and opposition at home grew, pressure mounted on the US government, and questions arose about Johnson's continued war powers. Then, two years after Richard Nixon had assumed office, Congress repealed the resolution, meaning no law on the books authorized US military force in Southeast Asia. Though Nixon began reducing the number of deployed US troops when he took office in 1969, bombing campaigns continued until the end of the war. A federal appeals court later declared the war a political issue and did not rule on the legality of Nixon's continued bombing, The New York Times reported. A total of 58,220 Americans died as a result of the war, per the National Archives. Bombing of Cambodia The aftermath of a US B-52 bombing in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Congress later passed the War Powers Resolution of 1973, limiting Nixon's military power. Bettman Archive/GettyImages Nixon also conducted bombing campaigns in Cambodia, which began in 1969 and continued after the repeal of the Gulf of Tonkin resolution. The operation — to disrupt supply routes along the Ho Chi Minh trail and to target suspected communist hubs — began in secret without Congress ever being informed. The bombings prompted Congress' passing of the War Powers Resolution of 1973, which aimed to limit the president's power in conducting military operations. Nixon vetoed the legislation, but Congress overrode the veto with a two-thirds majority. The successful war-powers challenge represented a rare moment in modern American history where Congress reclaimed its war powers. Wiest said political factors play a large role in Congress' usual inaction. "Partisanship and politics is part of it," Wiest said. "No congressman can be seen as being against the troops. In my view, there's no more risky electoral thing to do." From 1969 to 1973, the US dropped 540,000 tons of bombs on Cambodia. Estimates for civilians killed as a result of the bombings range from 150,000 to 500,000, per PBS Frontline. 1983 invasion of Grenada US soldiers run across a soccer field during the US invasion of Grenada in October 1983. Bettmann Archive/Getty Images In 1983, a coup in Grenada resulted in the execution of the country's leader, Maurice Bishop. Ostensibly to protect hundreds of medical students in the country and restore order after the government's overthrow, the US invaded the island nation with help from Caribbean allies. The US invasion, ordered by President Ronald Reagan, was carried out without congressional approval. This prompted Congress to apply the War Powers Resolution, forcing withdrawal of US troops within 60 days, The New York Times reported. The campaign only lasted eight days, but it resulted in the death of 19 US soldiers and 24 Grenadian civilians, per Army University Press. 1989 invasion of Panama US soldiers inspect a prison cell in Panama during the 1989 invasion. Steven D Starr/Corbis via Getty Images In what was codenamed Operation Just Cause, the US invaded Panama in 1989 with the intention of overthrowing its leader, Manuel Noriega, who was indicted under US law for drug trafficking. Other reasons cited for the operation were protecting Americans in Panama, defending democracy, and protecting the Panama Canal treaties. The State Department said the actions were also carried out with the consent of Panama's legitimate government, which was sworn in before the invasion. Like Reagan before him, President George H.W. Bush didn't seek congressional approval beforehand. However, the invasion had strong public and congressional support, subduing potential war-powers challenges. The invasion was swift, and Noriega was quickly captured and tried in the US. He was later convicted and sentenced to 40 years in prison, eventually serving 17 years in the US. All in all, 23 US soldiers were killed in the operation, and an internal US Army memo estimated the number of Panamanian deaths at around 1,000, per Politico. 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia A Kosovan civilian in Pec, Yugoslavia walks among rubble in June 1999. Georges MERILLON/Gamma-Rapho via Getty Images During the Kosovo War, NATO forces led by the US initiated a bombing campaign in Yugoslavia against the Yugoslav Army. NATO said the strikes were intended to stop "ethnic cleansing" of Kosovar Albanians by Yugoslav forces and to pressure those forces to leave Kosovo. Though Congress originally voted to send US peacekeeping troops to NATO in March of 1999 before the bombing began, a later House measure authorizing the strikes failed in a tie vote. The continued bombing campaign under President Bill Clinton later prompted a war powers lawsuit filed by 31 members of the House, which was dismissed by a judge on the grounds that "a clear impasse between the executive and legislative branches" was absent, CBS News reported. Much as with the Korean War after WWII, Wiest said, the notion of internationalism following the end of the Cold War provided cover for the operation's legality. "It was a period of early optimism in the wake of a world-changing event, so that optimism, with the top cover of the UN or NATO, just overwhelmed any American constitutional need to declare war," he said. As well as killing over 1,000 Yugoslav combatants, the strikes claimed the lives of roughly 500 civilians, per Human Rights Watch. 2011 US and NATO intervention in Libya A missile being fired from the USS Barry during operation Odyssey Dawn. DDG 52/GettyImages As part of an intervention conducted by NATO forces, US forces participated in strikes on Libya during the Libyan Civil War. In response to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi's attacks on civilians, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1973 on March 17, 2011, which authorized military action in Libya. President Barack Obama never sought congressional approval for the action, leading to criticism from Congress and 10 House members filing a lawsuit in an attempt to block further military action, NPR reported. The legal action was later dismissed by a federal judge, Reggie Walton, who noted that lawmakers already had the legislative means to challenge the military operation in Congress. In light of other pressing political issues, Walton said, "…the Court finds it frustrating to expend time and effort adjudicating the relitigation of settled questions of law." The Obama administration used the UN Security Council resolution as a justification and claimed the operation was limited and thus within the scope of the War Powers Resolution. US strikes in Yemen A Yemeni man walks among the rubble of a destroyed building. AFP/GettyImages The US struck Houthi targets in Yemen after the military group began targeting commercial ships in 2023 in response to Israel's invasion of the Gaza Strip. Both the Biden and Trump administrations conducted strikes against the Houthis without seeking congressional approval. The most recent strikes in 2025, conducted by the Trump administration, killed at least 224 civilians, per the Middle East monitoring group Airwars. Wiest said there's a double standard applied to ground versus air military operations, with the latter offering more war-powers leeway. "The use of air power has almost been a kind of national 'Get Out of Jail Free' card when it comes to opening these types of conflicts," he said. 2025 strikes on Iran nuclear sites B-2 spirit stealth bombers like the one pictured here over Afghanistan were used in Operation Midnight Hammer. USAF/Getty Images In what was codenamed Operation Midnight Hammer, the Trump administration struck Iran's nuclear facilities without Congressional approval. President Trump argued the strike was a necessary measure to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. While the strikes had the broad support of Republican lawmakers, Democrats and Republican Thomas Massie criticized the operation's lack of authorization from Congress, NPR reported. 2026 US raid inside Venezuela Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, and his wife, as they're escorted to court in Manhattan. ADAM GRAY/REUTERS On January 3, the Trump administration conducted surprise strikes on Venezuela that deposed the country's president, Nicolás Maduro. Maduro was captured and brought to the US, where he faces narco-terrorism and other drug charges. The former Venezuelan leader has pleaded not guilty. The Trump administration justified the strikes by calling them "law-enforcement operations" to target what it called Maduro's "narco-terrorist organization." The strikes resulted in about 75 deaths, including two civilians and 32 Cuban special forces, per the Center for Strategic & International Studies. Seven American troops were injured. Critics in Congress questioned the legality of the intervention. While a war powers resolution was brought to the floor for a vote in the Senate, it was blocked by the Republican-led majority. Editor's note: This story was originally published in March 2026. It was most recently updated in June 2026. Read the original article on Business Insider

Business Insider
newsbusiness insidergoogleragsafety

The author (right) and her son (left) disagree on AI. Courtesy of Crystal Hoshaw My teenage son hates AI, but I use it every day at work. At home, we have difficult conversations about AI and how to use it ethically. I'm proud of my son for thinking critically, and we're both keeping an open mind. Nearly every parent knows you can be literally anywhere with the kids — out to dinner, at the park, sitting around the living room, or packed in the car — and they'll come up with questions you can't answer. Until recently, my parental refrain was, "Let's Google it." Growing up with Google as a fact of life, my son never had any objections. Now that AI has hit the scene in full force, he's not as comfortable with my new response: "Let's ask AI." My son, Noah, has gleaned very clear anti-AI sentiments from YouTube, his peers, and likely ambient cultural unease. In many ways, I get it. He sees AI as an existential threat to humanity, the environment, and to creativity — very real and very mature concerns for a teen just entering high school. But while Noah is forming his worldview, learning to think critically, and determining his inner compass, I'm living in a world where AI is already embedded in how I work. I use AI as part of my daily workflow in corporate leadership At work, I'm often the one leading the charge of incorporating AI into the workflow. It's been a game-changer for team productivity, and I could argue that it's reduced work stress and the ennui of repetitive tasks. This isn't the life I imagined I'd be living. As a former philosophy major, questions of ethics, consciousness, and what it means to be human were part of my career path. In fact, my graduate continental philosophy program was replaced only a few years ago by ethics and artificial intelligence (if only I'd had the foresight to change my major). At my son's age, I would likely have had reservations and even deep convictions about the limitations of AI. Frankly, I'm proud of him. Yet at the same time, I'm drafting strategy docs and analytics decks daily, potentially draining rivers in the process. It's a contradiction that's hard to reconcile. My son and I are having difficult conversations While my son tends to see things as black and white, I see an opportunity to gently challenge that kind of thinking. It's not only a developmental phase — it's a very human impulse to simplify things that feel big and overwhelming. I'm not sure there's been a better example than AI since the advent of the atomic bomb. I tell my son that tools are just tools, and it's how they're wielded that matters. A hammer can build a house or destroy one, but that doesn't make a hammer bad. Most tools reflect the intentions of those behind them. That said, hammers can't build themselves, nor did the creator of the hammer put out a call for a coordinated slowdown across the industry because of the potential safety concerns. As such, I'm far from an AI cheerleader in the home, but I'm no doomsayer either. I'm not trying to raise a child who blindly accepts technology (or anything), but someone who can think critically inside complexity, to hold the tension of opposites without rushing to resolve it. If nothing else, this is what his future will demand of him. I want to help him understand that pragmatic adoption isn't blindly condoning AI and that wholesale rejection isn't going to stop AI from taking the world by storm. To face the reality of AI, we have to situate ourselves somewhere in the messy middle. We start at home with simple boundaries I'm not toggling between conversations with my son and a chatbot. I don't use AI to outsource meaningful creation. When I log off for the day, I focus on getting my hands messy in my garden and in making pottery, or getting sore thumbs mashing buttons with my son on his favorite video games. I don't know where Noah will ultimately land on AI. He may remain a skeptic, become an outspoken critic, or he may embrace it when he enters the workforce. What matters more to me is that we keep the dialogue going: that he continues to question the world around him, that he learns not just what to think, but how. Above all, I want him to know it's possible to engage meaningfully with something imperfect without surrendering your values to it. We're both figuring it out in real time: him as a teen stepping into a rapidly changing world, and me as a parent trying to model what it means to live thoughtfully inside it. For now, that feels like enough. Read the original article on Business Insider

Towards Data Science
agentic aideep diveskubernetesmlopssystem architectureaitowards data sciencellmagentagentsgpu

A systems-level deep dive into the hidden microarchitectural costs of Kubernetes GPU time-slicing, and what it actually costs to co-locate Agentic AI workloads. The post GPU Time-Slicing for Concurrent LLM Agents on Kubernetes appeared first on Towards Data Science.